Framing Theory and Ethnic Dynamisms; A Theoretical Reflection

This article examines the descriptive and explanatory ability of framing theory in the study of ethnic dynamisms. This theoretical perspective emphasizes on the role of culture and meaning in the study of collective behaviors and dynamisms of actors for constructing and expanding new meanings which are different from dominant discourse. The central aim of interpretative framing is mobilization and stimulating of proponents and demobilization of opponents.
Concerning ethnic dynamism, the framing process constructs ethnic perceptions and demands through drawing distinct boundaries between insiders and outsiders, highlighting the historical responsibility and politicization of ethnicity and cultural elements in order to mobilize advocates and activists of ethnic dynamisms.
The application of this theory in the analysis of ethnic dynamisms is criticized for some reasons. First critique refers to its descriptive and lack of explanatory and analytical nature. Furthermore the framing process neglects the authenticity of cultural elements and politicize them. By so doing, this theory takes the form of political project and instrument for politicization of ethnicity and mobilization of ethnic groups Some critics argue that this perspective uses the notions of some other theories such as resource mobilization, rational choice and political opportunity structure theories, thus the framing theory represents as a non-innovative theory. Additionally this perspective weakens the social integration and solidarity by politicization of differences and margialization of similarities among various groups of the society.